The Effect of Soil pH on the Living Conditions Essay Example For Students

The Effect of Soil pH on the Living Conditions Essay The Effect of Soil pH on the Living Conditions In Lumbricus terrestrisAbstractThe difference in soil pH weighs a heavy measure on the appearance of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris in different areas of soil. A highly acidic or highly alkaline soil may be the underlying reason for the absence of this earthworm in certain areas where pH plays a large role. In this experiment, soil pH was altered with Miracida soil acidifier and Agricultural Limestonea soil correctional for acidic soil. This was done to test the effects pH would have on the living conditions of Lumbricus terrestris over a twenty-one day period. The experiment shows the fluctuation of numbers on a daily and weekly basis verifying the theory that the earthworm prefers a soil with a pH between 6.0 and 7.0. In summary, this paper provides a three week synopsis of a closed experiment showing the preference of soil pH for the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. KEY WORDS: Lumbricus terrestris, earthworm, soil, pH, acid, alkaline, limestone, Miracid, Agricultural Limestone, living conditionIntroductionMany earthworm species in North America existing today actually originated from Europe (Minard). One of these earthworms is known as Lumbricus terrestris, or the Night crawler. According to the University of California, the Night Crawler is of Palaearctic Origin and can grow to sizes from 90mm x 6mm to 300mm x 10mm. Lumbricus terrestris has a dark anterior with a lighter posterior. Contrary to most belief, the earthworm is not a symmetrical tube-like organism. This is because it has no proper top or bottom and in Lumbricus terrestris, the posterior end has the ability to flatten. The life span of this particular earthworm can be anywhere from 2.5 to 6 years, maturing around day 350 (University of California). Lumbricus terrestris is common in cultivated soils where is builds vertical living tubes as deep as two meters into the subsoil (Graff). Lumbricus terrestris are detrivorous which means they eat leaf litter by taking it underground to the top layer of soil and by consuming soil. The earthworms take in food at the surface or in the op soil layer and deposit excrements along the lining of the tubes. Earthworms are considered to exert significant direct and indirect positive effects on soil quality and fertility, and consequently, they are important organisms in ecotoxicity tests and in contaminated land assessments (Georgiev, 2004). Several factors, such as soil characteristics (pH, organic matter content, etc.), chemical properties of the contaminants and environmental conditions (precipitation, temperature) affect the exposure and potential hazard to biota (Barendregt, 2004). The soil characteristic concentrated on in this experiment was soil pHthe measure of acidity and alkalinity. The pH of soil can range from very acidic, 1-6 on the pH scale, to very alkaline, 8-14 on the pH scale, with 7 being neutral. Worms pref er soil at a pH between 6.0 and 7.0; higher than 7.0 and lower than 6.0 can be potentially harmful to the earthworms (wormman). There are many ways to alter the soil pH. According to the Garden Helper, to make a soil more basic, the most commonly used product is powdered limestone. Also, it states that some natural products that can be used to make soil more acidic are sulfur, sawdust, composted leaves, wood chips, cottonseed meal, leaf mold, and peat moss. There are also other ways to change the pH of soil such as using man-made chemicals. Earthworms take up organic compounds through their skin as well as from their food (Fleuren, 2003). In this study, the soil pH was altered and tested to find the preferred living conditions for Lumbricus terrestris over a three week time period. Methods and MaterialsTo begin the experiment, 50 Lumbricus terrestris worms were obtained from a bait and tackle shop and then separated into groups of ten in separate containers with some soil in each. Next, potting soil was placed in a 74cm x 19cm x 15.5cm container. This was the main container used in the experiment. Once the soil level was equal throughout the container, it was partitioned off into five separate sectionseach 14.8cm in length. The sections were separated by four Plexiglas squares with four holes drilled in each. The soil in each section was treated individually. The first section on the far left end was treated with Miracid, a soil acidifier. Approximately four tablespoons of Miracid was mixed with 3.79 liters of water. Before adding the solution to the soil, all the soil was placed in another container in order to keep the solution from mixing with the other sections; once added, the soil was mixed. The section directly to the right of the first treated section was also treated with Miracid. Approximately 1.5 tablespoons was added to 3.79 liters. The same procedure for adding the solution to the soil was followed for this section also. The middle section was the neutral section and water was the only liquid used to moisten the soil. The last two sections were treated with Agricultural Limestone. The soil in the section on the far right was placed in a separate container and had approximately twelve tablespoons added to the soil and then moistened with water until the limestone was fully saturated. Once the limestone was saturated, it was th en mixed in with the soil. The soil in the section to the left of this (between the neutral soil and the very alkaline soil) was removed and placed in a separate container similar to the other sections. Approximately six tablespoons of limestone were then added to the soil and moistened. Once fully saturated, the limestone was mixed in with the soil. After all the soils had been treated, they were then placed in their designated sections in the large container in order from most acidic on the left to most alkaline on the right. The soil was then left to sit overnight so ensure the soil pH. Have you ever sat around with a group of friends a EssayFleuren, R. H. J., Elbert A. Hogendoorn, Gert De Korte, and Tjalling Jager. 2003. Elucidating the Routes of Exposure for Organic Chemicals in the Earthworm, Eisenia Andrei (Oligcharta). Environmental Science and Technology 37: 3399-3404. Garden Helper, The. 1999. http://www.thegardenhelper.com/acidsoil.html. Georgiev, O., A. John Morgan, Peter Kille, and Stephen R. Strzenbaum. 2004. Cadmium Detoxification in Earthworms: From Genes to Cells. Environmental Science and Technology 38: 6283-6289. Graff, O. 1967. About the Dislocation into the Subsoil of Nutrient Elements through the Activity of Earthworms. LANDWIRT FORSCH 20 (2-3): 117-127. Minard, A. 2003. Researchers build a case for earthworms slimy reputation. New York Times 153, no. 52650. University of California Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program. http://www.sarep.ucdavis.edu/worms/profile6.htm. Worm Mans Worm Farm. 2005. wormman.com. http://www.wormman.com/ph_of_your_soil_and_worm_bed.cfm.